> On 8. Aug 2018, at 17:23, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I'm writing some tests and would like to come to a common understanding as to > whether we are should use pytest fixtures and parametrized classes and > functions. The immediate problem is testing over all types that should be > supported, which something we should to much more of and is most easily > achieved using one of those pytest tools. The advantage is code clarity and > more informative error messages, the disadvantage is being dependent on > pytest as unittest does not support that functionality. > > Thoughts? > > Chuck > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
Hi all! I think it mainly depends on how likely we are to move away from Pytest. And I’m assuming not very likely. Anything likely to replace it (which won’t happen short-term in any case) will already have something similar, IMO. So my vote is we go ahead and use them. Hameer Abbasi _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
