On Sat, Aug 11, 2018 at 1:22 AM, Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 16:05 -0600, Charles R Harris wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Do we have a policy for the stacklevel that should be used in NumPy? > > How far back should the stack be displayed? I note that the optimum > > stacklevel may vary between users and developers. > > > > I thought it was so that it will point to the correct user line (or > tend to point there). So stacklevel=2 for exposed and higher for > private (python) functions IIRC. > As for developers, I would hope they are OK with (and know how to) > turning the warning into an error. > > Not sure we discussed it much, I seem to have a vague memory of asking > if we are sure this is what we want and at least Ralf agreeing. Also I > don't know how consistent it is overall. > That sounds right to me. I think when it was introduced it was quite consistent, because Sebastian replace warning filters everywhere with suppress_warnings. Would be good to document this in the devguide. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
