Makes sense to me On Sat, Sep 1, 2018 at 9:15 PM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Recently a few people (Tyler, Matti, myself, maybe others?) were discussing > the history of missing data in the context of custom dtypes. I mentioned > that there was a good write-up, but couldn't find it at the time. I just > stumbled across it, it's hidden in the numpy.org repo: > http://www.numpy.org/NA-overview. So hope this helps. > > That document further references two alternative NEPs that didn't make it > into our repo: > 1. https://gist.github.com/njsmith/1056379 (authors Matthew Brett, Nathaniel > Smith), > 2. https://gist.github.com/njsmith/1068264 (author Nathaniel Smith), > as well as another summary: > https://github.com/njsmith/numpy/wiki/NA-discussion-status > > I'd like to see the NEPs rescued, and the summary moved from the numpy.org > repo (maybe into yet another NEP?). It would be best if the original authors > do this, but otherwise I'm happy to do it. Thoughts? > > Cheers, > Ralf > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
-- Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
