On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 8:33 PM Tyler Reddy <tyler.je.re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Allan, > > That's pretty cool -- I should follow-up on the CI part of it! > It's quite nice to have access to more exotic hardware, but I'd recommend not to add anything to our CI setup that's not a fully hosted service that we control via a simple config file plus clicking some buttons on a web interface once. Custom code and server credentials/maintenance stuff should be avoided - always becomes painful at some point. Cheers, Ralf > Tyler > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 at 20:18, Allan Haldane <allanhald...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 09/12/2018 08:14 PM, Tyler Reddy wrote: >> > Would also be cool to have native ppc64 arch in CI, but I checked >> > briefly with IBM and no such integration exists with github as far as >> > the contact knew. >> >> Hi Tyler, >> >> ppc64 CI is available through OSUOSL. Earlier this year I requested a >> ppc64be test server through them, for numpy use, see this email and the >> links therein: >> >> >> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2018-January/077570.html >> >> At the time I didn't sign up for CI because my focus was the test >> server, but I think it is still very much an option to ask for CI if we >> want. I don't yet have the time to do it myself, but I think anyone >> interested could do it pretty easily. >> >> Incidentally, the test server is still available to any numpy devs who >> need it, just ping me for access. >> >> Cheers, >> Allan >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
