On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 2:15 PM Eric Wieser <wieser.eric+nu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If the only way MaskedArray violates Liskov is in terms of NA skipping > aggregations by default, then this might be viable > > One of the ways to fix these liskov substitution problems is just to > introduce more base classes - for instance, if we had an `NDContainer` base > class with only slicing support, then masked arrays would be an exact > liskov substitution, but np.matrix would not. > > Eric > I've had the same thought and wouldn't be surprised if others have considered that possibility. Travis would be a good guy to ask about that. <snip> Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
