On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 2:38 PM Pavlyk, Oleksandr < oleksandr.pav...@intel.com> wrote:
> Sorry for not being more explicit. > > > > Yes, the milestone gives me a set of PRs whose changes are designated for > 1.16 > > > > If I were to manually build sources for 1.16 candidate I would > > 1. create a branch at some SHA in the master, > > 2. cherry-pick commits from PRs enumerated in milestone/58 > not reachable from the chosen SHA. > > > > What I am missing is the convention on how to choose the merge-base in > step 1. > > > > I am interesting in building sources so that I can try to generate patches > on top of these sources in advance, and have myself enough time to resolve > possible conflicts. > Just master right now. At some point, there will be a release branch, but that will be much closer to the release when most of the PRs are merged already merged and it's just last minute fixes and release-specific changes (e.g. bumping version numbers, etc.) to do. -- Robert Kern
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion