Hi, I'm pretty sure not all funding is acknowledged on scikit-learn's frontpage. I think the minimum amount to be acknowledge with a logo is funding for a full time developer for at least a year, ie at least 100k€. Cheers, N
On Sat, 18 May 2019 at 09:37, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > In [1] I am adding institutional partners and sponsor logos to the > numpy.org website. Sebastian made some good comments there, and I think > it would be very helpful if we had some guidelines on how we acknowledge > sponsorship. > > Our governance doc has clear text on what an Institutional Partner is, see > [2]. We don't have anything written down about sponsorship though. In my > open PR I followed the example of Jupyter (see [3]), which lists > Institutional Partners first, followed by Sponsors. > > For sponsors I think we will want to define some minimum level of > sponsorship for which we will put a logo somewhere (main page, or about > page). Jupyter seems to just put everything together. Scikit-learn and > NumFOCUS do the same on their front pages. NumFOCUS has tiered levels as > well with different benefits, and displays the tiers at [4]. Page 17 of the > NumFOCUS sponsorship brochure [5] spells out the sponsorship levels very > clearly: from platinum at $100k to bronze at $10k, and a special level for > "emerging leader" (startups) below that. > > I think that following the NumFOCUS model would be the most > straightforward thing to do, because (a) we're part of NumFOCUS, and (b) > it's very well documented. And also fairest in a way - it gives some > recognition proportionally to the contribution. My PR right now lists > Moore, Sloan and Tidelift as the 3 sponsors. The first two contributed on > the order of $500k each (spread out over 2-3 years), while Tidelift > currently contributes $1000/month. > > So I propose: > - acknowledging all active sponsorship (within the last 12 months) by logo > placement on numpy.org > - acknowledging past sponsorship as well on numpy.org, but on a separate > page and perhaps just as a listing rather than prominent logo placement > - adopting the NumFOCUS tiered sponsorship model > - listing institutional partners and sponsors in the same place, with > partners first (following what Jupyter does). > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, > Ralf > > > [1] https://github.com/numpy/numpy.org/pull/21 > [2] > https://www.numpy.org/devdocs/dev/governance/governance.html#institutional-partners-and-funding > [3] https://jupyter.org/about > [4] https://numfocus.org/sponsors > [5] > https://numfocus.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/NumFOCUS-Corporate-Sponsorship-Brochure.pdf > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
