вт, 25 июн. 2019 г. в 21:20, Cameron Blocker <cameronjbloc...@gmail.com>:
> It seems to me that the general consensus is that we shouldn't be changing > .T to do what we've termed matrix transpose or conjugate transpose. > Reading through this thread, I can not say that I have the same opinion - at first, many looked positively at the possibility of change - `arr.T` to mean a transpose of the last two dimensions by default, and then people start discussing several different (albeit related) topics at once. So, I want to point out that it is rather difficult to follow what is currently discussed in this thread, probably because several different (albeit related) topics are being discussed at once. I would suggest at first discuss `arr.T` change, because other topics somewhat depend on that (`arr.MT`/`arr.CT`/`arr.H` and others). p.s: Documentation about `.T` shows only two examples, for 1d - to show that it works and for 2d case. Maybe it means something? (especially for new `numpy` users. ) with kind regards, -gdg
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
