On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:18 PM Jens Jørgen Mortensen <j...@dtu.dk> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to use dgemm, zgemm and friends from scipy.linalg.blas to
> multiply matrices efficiently. As an example, I'd like to do:
>
> c += a.dot(b)
>
> using whatever BLAS scipy is linked to and I want to avoid copies of
> large matrices. This works the way I want it:
(snip)
Hi,
This is not a direct answer to your question, but are you only trying
to use low-level BLAS or the sake of memory, or are there other
considerations? I'm not certain but I think `a.dot` will call BLAS for
matrices (hence its speed and multithreaded capabilities), so CPU time
might already be optimal. As for memory, most numpy functions (and
definitely numpy arithmetic) can be used with functions in the main
numpy namespace, using the `out` keyword to specify an existing array
in which to print. So for your simple example,
>>> import numpy as np
... a = np.ones((2, 3), order='F')
... b = np.ones((3, 4), order='F')
... c = np.zeros((7, 4), order='F')[:2, :]
... np.add(c, a.dot(b), out=c)
array([[3., 3., 3., 3.],
[3., 3., 3., 3.]])
>>> c
array([[3., 3., 3., 3.],
[3., 3., 3., 3.]])
As you can see non-contiguous arrays Just Work™. You will still create
a temporary array for `a.dot(b)` but I'm not sure you can spare that.
Would low-level BLAS allow you to reduce memory at that step as well?
And is there other motivation for you to go down to the metal?
Regards,
András
>
> >>> import numpy as np
> >>> from scipy.linalg.blas import dgemm
> >>> a = np.ones((2, 3), order='F')
> >>> b = np.ones((3, 4), order='F')
> >>> c = np.zeros((2, 4), order='F')
> >>> dgemm(1.0, a, b, 1.0, c, 0, 0, 1)
> array([[3., 3., 3., 3.],
> [3., 3., 3., 3.]])
> >>> print(c)
> [[3. 3. 3. 3.]
> [3. 3. 3. 3.]]
>
> but if c is not contiguous, then c is not overwritten:
>
> >>> c = np.zeros((7, 4), order='F')[:2, :]
> >>> dgemm(1.0, a, b, 1.0, c, 0, 0, 1)
> array([[3., 3., 3., 3.],
> [3., 3., 3., 3.]])
> >>> print(c)
> [[0. 0. 0. 0.]
> [0. 0. 0. 0.]]
>
> Which is also what the docs say, but I think the raw BLAS function dgemm
> could do the update of c in-place by setting LDC=7. See here:
>
> http://www.netlib.org/lapack/explore-html/d7/d2b/dgemm_8f.html
>
> Is there a way to call the raw BLAS function from Python?
>
> I found this capsule thing, but I don't know if there is a way to call
> that (maybe using ctypes):
>
> >>> from scipy.linalg import cython_blas
> >>> cython_blas.__pyx_capi__['dgemm']
> <capsule object "void (char *, char *, int *, int *, int *,
> __pyx_t_5scipy_6linalg_11cython_blas_d *,
> __pyx_t_5scipy_6linalg_11cython_blas_d *, int *,
> __pyx_t_5scipy_6linalg_11cython_blas_d *, int *,
> __pyx_t_5scipy_6linalg_11cython_blas_d *,
> __pyx_t_5scipy_6linalg_11cython_blas_d *, int *)" at 0x7f06fe1d2ba0>
>
> Best,
> Jens Jørgen
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list
> NumPy-Discussion@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
