Our organization is still using CentOS-6, so my vote is for that. Thanks, Tom
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:38 PM Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > Pretty sure the 2010 and 2014 images both have much newer compilers than > that. > > There are still a lot of users on CentOS 6, so I'd still stick to 2010 for > now on x86_64 at least. We could potentially start adding 2014 wheels for > the other platforms where we currently don't ship wheels – gotta be better > than nothing, right? > > There probably still is some tail of end users whose pip is too old to > know about 2010 wheels. I don't know how big that tail is. If we wanted to > be really careful, we could ship both manylinux1 and manylinux2010 wheels > for a bit – pip will automatically pick the latest one it recognizes – and > see what the download numbers look like. > > On Tue, Feb 4, 2020, 13:18 Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> Thought now would be a good time to decide on upgrading manylinux for the >> 1.19 release so that we can make sure that everything works as expected. >> The choices are >> >> manylinux1 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0513/> -- CentOS 5, >> currently used, gcc 4.2 (in practice 4.5), only supports i686, x86_64. >> manylinux2010 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0571/> -- CentOS 6, >> gcc 4.5, only supports i686, x86_64. >> manylinux2014 <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0599/> -- CentOS 7, >> gcc 4.8, supports many more architectures. >> >> The main advantage of manylinux2014 is that it supports many new >> architectures, some of which we are already testing against. The main >> disadvantage is that it requires pip >= 19.x, which may not be much of a >> problem 4 months from now but will undoubtedly cause some installation >> problems. Unfortunately, the compiler remains archaic, but folks interested >> in performance should be using a performance oriented distribution or >> compiling for their native architecture. >> >> Chuck >> >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
