On Fri, Apr 24, 2020, at 08:45, Joshua Wilson wrote: > But, Stephan pointed out that it might be confusing to users for > objects to only exist at typing time, so we came around to the > question of whether people are open to the idea of including the type > aliases in NumPy itself. Ralf's concrete proposal was to make a module > numpy.types (or maybe numpy.typing) to hold the aliases so that they > don't pollute the top-level namespace. The module would initially > contain the types
That sounds very sensible. Having types available with NumPy should also encourage their use, especially if we can add some documentation around it. Stéfan _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
