On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:19 PM Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 3:15 PM Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 1:31 AM Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 7:14 AM Sandro Tosi <mo...@debian.org> wrote: >>> >>>> hey! >>>> >>>> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 7:52 PM Charles R Harris >>>> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > Downstream developers should use Cython >= 0.29.16 for Python 3.8 >>>> support and OpenBLAS >= 3.7 to avoid wrong results on the Skylake >>>> architecture. The NumPy Wheels for this release can be downloaded from >>>> PyPI, source archives and release notes are available from Github. >>>> >>>> just so that i can re-configure (if necessary) our automation in >>>> Debian, is this going to be the future setting for releasing numpy? >>>> wheels via PyPI and source via github? I stumbled upon this since >>>> there's no source release available on PyPI for 1.19.0rc2 >>>> >>> >>> That looks like a mistake. An sdist must be uploaded to PyPI, after the >>> wheels are uploaded. That just seems to have been forgotten for rc2. >>> >>> Also, I had expected the sdist to be the .tar.gz format, I can't find it >>> back but IIRC that's what we decided in the past. It's smaller, and it's >>> what pretty much all other projects do. >>> >>> >> NumPy has always used zip since PyPI limited the number of source >> releases. We did that before SciPy. >> >> > And I did upload the source file > > 947 twine upload release/installers/*.whl > 948 twine upload release/installers/*.zip > > Wonder what happened to it? Maybe I missed an upload failure? > > Should be fixed. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
