On Sun, Nov 1, 2020, at 18:54, Jarrod Millman wrote: > I also misunderstood the purpose of the NEP. I assumed it was > intended to encourage projects to drop old versions of Python. Other > people have viewed the NEP similarly: > https://github.com/networkx/networkx/issues/4027
Of all the packages, it makes sense for NumPy to behave most conservatively with depreciations. The NEP suggests allowable support periods, but as far as I recall does not enforce minimal support. Stephan Hoyer had a good recommendation on how we can clarify the NEP to be easier to intuit. Stephan, shall we make an ammendment to the NEP with your idea? Best regards, Stéfan _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
