On Wed, Nov 4, 2020, at 16:21, Aaron Meurer wrote: > But as I noted, this is already off topic for the original discussion > here, and since there's apparently no interest in improving the NEP > wording, I'll drop it.
I was trying to understand where, specifically, the language falls short, and what to do about improving it. Perhaps a sentence making it clear that this is not a licensing issue will assuage your concerns? If not, please help me understand where statements are overly strong, unclear, or insufficient in coverage. Best regards, Stéfan _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
