On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 7:39 PM Sebastian Berg <sebast...@sipsolutions.net>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> the `np.ndenumerate` does not work well for masked arrays (like many
> main namespace functions, it simply ignores/drops the mask).
>
> There is a PR (https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/20020) to add a
> version of it to `np.ma` (masked array specific).  And we thought it
> seemed reasonable and were planning on putting it in.
>
> This version skips all masked elements.  An alternative could be to
> return `np.ma.masked` for masked elements?
>
> So if anyone thinks that may be the better solution, please send a
> brief mail.
>

Would it be a bad idea to add a kwarg that specifies this behaviour (i.e.
offering both alternatives)? Assuming people might need the masked items to
be there under certain circumstances. Perhaps when zipping masked data with
dense data?

AndrĂ¡s



> (Personally, I don't have opinions on masked arrays for the most part.)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sebastian
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
> Member address: deak.and...@gmail.com
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to