As a data point against relying on QEMU: statsmodels times out (5+ hours) when trying to build with QEMU rising cibuildwheel and GitHub actions.
Kevin On Fri, Jan 14, 2022, 08:53 Matti Picus <matti.pi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 14/1/22 3:04 am, Charles R Harris wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Travis wheel build problems again. There is still a positive balance, > > but apparently it is insufficiently positive. Which is strange if > > ARM64 is free. Wheel builds have been failing since last weekend. > > > > Matti, could you ask for more credits? I'm thinking we really need to > > move off travis for ARM builds. > > > > Chuck > > > > I sent a request to supp...@travis-ci.com. > > > If we want to move off travis for aarch64, I think the only option right > now is to use emulation, conda-forge does this on Azure machines [0] and > the build + tests takes ~40 minutes. I can only imagine how long it > would take to do move SciPy to a QEMU. > > > Do we have a way to reach out to an industry contact in the ARM > foundation or to AWS (who have aarch 64 cloud machines) or NVidia (who > also manufacture aarch64 machines) and discuss the problem with them? > > Matti > > > [0] > > https://dev.azure.com/conda-forge/feedstock-builds/_build/results?buildId=434709&view=logs&jobId=e9afaa34-1a0f-534e-78fc-fae528ccd915&j=e9afaa34-1a0f-534e-78fc-fae528ccd915&t=48395e60-bc5f-5e45-7455-d404f0c95f3a > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ > Member address: kevin.k.shepp...@gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
