On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 08:09:02PM +0100, Sebastian Berg wrote: > Thanks for bringing this up again. The Python method exists and it > seems like relatively basic functionality. > > Overall, I am slightly in favor of adding the ufunc. So if nobody > voices an opinion that it doesn't seem a good fit for NumPy, I would be > happy to move forward with it. > > - Sebastian > > > PS: One of my main concern would be if we were to add many bitwise > functions, in which case a `bitwise` namespace might be nice. But I am > not convinced that should stop us here.
Technically speaking, bitwise_and, birwise_or, bitwise_xor and bitwise_not already exist and popcount is widely spread, it already has its compiler builtin under the name of __builtin_popcount _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
