Hi all,
as brought up many times, I would like to aim for a NumPy 2.0. The
current hope would be to release within the year and start adding small
breaking changes soon, but hidden behind feature flags. Similar to
what is already the case for NEP 50 with
`exportNPY_PROMOTION_STATE=weak`.
Below, is a draft version for a NEP, I have also created the
corresponding project board on github.
Clearly, especially specific changes will need more discussion, but
there are some clearer bigger ones as well as small changes that are
breaking but should be easy to adapt for.
Thanks to Inessa and Ralf who helped draft and revise this!
Cheers,
Sebastian
Road to NumPy 2.0> Note: This is a living document. We are prepared to modify
it through
> continued dialogue with the community. Its acceptance indicates
> consensus on the process and timelines.
AbstractNumPy 2.0 release is an opportunity to make some complex changes for
which a normal deprecation wouldn’t be viable as the user impact may be
larger than is normally considered acceptable for a minor release. Yet,
NumPy 2.0 is not meant to be a large breaking release. Most users
should not need to worry about introduced changes.
This document contains essential information about the work on NumPy
2.0 release.
Motivation and impactNumPy 2.0 release is required for fixing old bugs and
modernizing
NumPy’s code base. It is not planned to be a “break the world release”.
This means:
* It must be possible to compile downstream packages to be compatible
with both new and old NumPy versions. However, the C-API is expected
to be broken. The path to achieve this compatibility will be defined
as a high priority project.
* The majority of users should not require code updates or such
updates should be very easy to do. Expert users are likely to notice
changes though.
* We accept that some NumPy users may not able to adopt NumPy 2.0
immediately or may have to wait until following releases for
adoption.
One should keep in mind that even bug fixes can break the code of a
small number of users.
TimelineNumPy 2.0 will be scheduled for release in Jan 2024. Projects and
changes should be proposed as soon as possible. We propose a NumPy team
meeting around April 2023 (details to be discussed) in order to
finalize high-impact projects and review all candidate projects.
Projects not proposed by this time may not be prioritized for a final
2.0 release.
Changes which can be implemented using a feature-flag are strongly
encouraged as it simplifies keeping projects moving.
Project selection processTo determine the scope of work for NumPy 2.0 release,
we suggest
introducing three categories of projects/proposals:
1. high: proposal requires high visibility or may be critical for
the NumPy 2.0 release,
2. normal,
3. candidate: changes which are in an early planning stage.
High priority proposals will be listed explicitly in this NEP.
A project board will track all projects proposed for NumPy 2.0,
distinguishing the category and progress.
Proposing a project for NumPy 2.0 releaseTo start a project, there is one
important thing: Believe that your
change makes NumPy better and commit to trying to make it happen.
To have a proposal listed on the NumPy 2.0 project board, we require
the following:
* At least two champions for each proposal, one of whom must be a
NumPy core developer or similar to one in standing.
* A brief assessment of the anticipated impact on downstream and end-
users. This means assessing how many users/what groups of users are
affected and in what way.
* Support by the NumPy community or Steering Council (ideally both).
Positive feedback to your proposal on the NumPy mailing list is a
strong indicator of the community support.
If any of the above requirements are not met, proposals will be listed
as “candidate”. NumPy maintainers will review “candidate” projects on a
case by case basis.
We suggest including a brief header in every proposal (issue or PR):
* **Champions**: * **Severity**: How does it affect users? * **Affects**:
Who/how many users does it affect?
Any further details or adjustments shall be added on request. Large
changes may require their own NEP when requested by a maintainer.
As a suggestion, “affects” could be roughly guided by the number of
users: rare, limited, common, and ubiquitous. While “severity” could
be minor, typical (code update needed), severe (e.g. large
change/difficult to find), critical (incorrect results or no clear path
for fixing things). The two together can then be used as a basis for
decision making and discussion.
Scope of workHigh priority projectsThe projects in this section are considered
high impact from the
compatibility point of view.
Unless otherwise noted, these are currently proposals, most of these
changes have their own NEPs which should be accepted.
Enable breaking the C-APINumPy needs to define a process for breaking C-API.
This project does
not define what is broke, this is done separately on a case-by-case
basis.
We simply assume that sufficient changes will be done to make this
worthwhile.
* Status: Planning
* Champion: Matti Picus (?), Sebastian Berg (?)
* Severity: Severe (for maintainers without a plan), typical for users
* Affects: Library maintainers, some users
* Notes:Many users may have issues if pip installing a very new NumPy
version without updating other libraries. We assume that this isn’t
a common scenario and will mostly result in clear errors.All
libraries will have to be recompiled. The transition plan will
ensure that libraries adhering to best practices will have an easy
transition.
> Note: A full plan is still outstanding and may require its own NEP.
Adopt NEP 50Adopting NEP 50 changes the promotion behavior of NumPy scalars by
removing any value-based casting. Details for this change are discussed
in :ref:NEP50.
* Status: Largely implemented, but open for discussions and open
questions to be addressed.
* Champion: Sebastian Berg, …
* Severity: High in rare cases, some results can change or memory can
bloat.
* Affects: Many users, but hopefully not most as one needs to use
smaller than default precision types to be affected.
A thorough cleanup of the Python APIThe NumPy API is quite messy, with many
functions and aliases that are
not recommended for use, namespaces that are private but missing
underscores, inconsistencies in argument names, and more. Changes will
include removing aliases and outdated functionality (including many
things that have been doc-deprecated already), making namespaces
private, and making function signatures more consistent.
* Status: Needs a separate NEP, and deprecations in 1.25.0 for what
can be deprecated in a sensible way.
* Champion: Ralf Gommers, Stefan van der Walt, …
* Severity: Medium. It is expected that a lot of projects and users
will see some breakage, but also that code changes to more idiomatic
usage will be straightforward and compatible with both numpy 1.X and
2.0
* Affects: Many users and downstream projects
Add array API standard support to the main namespaceThe main reason NEP 47
aimed for a separate numpy.array_api submodule
rather than the main namespace is that casting rules differed too much.
With NEP 50 (see above), that will be resolved in NumPy 2.0. Having
NumPy be a superset of the array API standard will be a significant
improvement for code portability to other libraries (CuPy, JAX,
PyTorch, etc.) and thereby address one of the top user requests from
the 2020 NumPy user survey (GPU support). See the numpy.array_api API
docs for an overview of differences between it and the main namespace
(the “strictness” ones are not applicable).
* Status: separate NEP to be written.
* Champion: Aaron Meurer, Ralf Gommers
* Severity: Medium. Most impact of breaking changes is likely
concentrated in a few widely used APIs (e.g., change semantics
of copy=False keyword to actually mean “don’t copy” rather than
“copy if needed”)
* Affects: most users and downstream projects
Other projectsSee the project board.
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
