On Tue, Feb 14, 2023, at 12:27, Ralf Gommers wrote: > Okay, as long as we keep in mind that it should contain all these > not-for-main-namespace functions/classes, it seems fine with me. We can live > with two namespaces (`types` and `exceptions`), but more would get a bit too > much. We were planning to use `np.lib.*` for more detailed user-facing > functions that didn't belong in the main namespace, so let's make sure that > we don't end up with >2 of these kinds of namespaces right below the top > level one.
If it's mainly for internal use, we can also use sub-namespaces under lib right now, and not add those to the main namespace with the next release? I.e., we can create `lib.types`, `lib.exceptions` and whatever we want, and then import lib as _np or similar internally. Stéfan
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
