Also, I don’t know if this could be of value, but my use case for this is to 
find overlaps, then split arrays into overlapping and non-overlapping segments.

Thus, it might be useful for `return_indices=True` to return indices of all 
instances, not only the first.

Also, in my case I need both overlapping and non-overlapping indices, but this 
would become ambiguous with more than 2 arrays.

If it was left with 2 array input, then it can be extended to return both 
overlapping and non-overlapping parts. I think it could be another potential 
path to consider.

E.g. what would be the speed comparison:
intr = intersect1d(arr1, arr2, assume_unique=False)
intr = intersect1d(intr, np.unique(arr3), assume_unique=True)

# VS new

intr = intersect1d(arr1, arr2, arr3, assume_unique=False)
Then, does the gain from such generalisation justify constriction it introduces?

Regards,
DG

> On 2 Feb 2024, at 17:31, Marten van Kerkwijk <m...@astro.utoronto.ca> wrote:
> 
>> For my own work, I required the intersect1d function to work on multiple 
>> arrays while returning the indices (using `return_indizes=True`). 
>> Consequently I changed the function in numpy and now I am seeking 
>> feedback from the community.
>> 
>> This is the corresponding PR: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/pull/25688
> 
> <snip>
> 
> To me this looks like a very sensible generalization.  In terms of numpy
> API, the only real change is that, effectively, the assume_unique and
> return_indices arguments become keyword-only, i.e., in the unlikely case
> that someone passed those as positional, a trivial backward-compatible
> change will fix it.
> 
> -- Marten
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
> Member address: dom.grigo...@gmail.com

_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to