On Tue, Oct 1, 2024 at 9:57 AM Evgeni Burovski via NumPy-Discussion < numpy-discussion@python.org> wrote:
> I like this, too. > > And I think the trailing comment, # shape=... is much better, as it gets > the best of both worlds: user get the info, and tools which do > eval(repr(..)) only need to learn to ignore the comment. For one, numpy's > own doctests will keep working with no churn since scipy_doctest handles > this already. > Given that we've already chosen to use the fake `shape=...` keyword when there is a 0-length axis, what do you think we should do, consistency-wise? >>> np.empty([10, 0]) array([], shape=(10, 0), dtype=float64) 1. Follow the precedent and use the fake `shape=...` keyword in the summarized-array case. 2. Ignore the precedent and use a following `# shape=...` comment afterwards in the summarized-array case and leave the 0-length-axis case alone. 3. Fix the 0-length-axis case to use the following `# shape=...` comment too. -- Robert Kern
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/ Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com
