On Mon, Nov 10, 2025, at 11:29, Ralf Gommers via NumPy-Discussion wrote: > I agree with this concern. It's not *that* much and the code is trivially > fixable by replacing `fix` with `trunc`. So a slow deprecation with removal > in a 3.0 release would already be quite conservative compared to our normal > deprecation policy. We don't need to make a special exception and keep an > alias around forever without documenting it.
I think that's fine; with NumPy 3 being far away, we won't be breaking anyone's code anytime soon. Stéfan
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/numpy-discussion.python.org Member address: [email protected]
