On 2/16/07, Keith Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/15/07, Sebastian Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/15/07, Keith Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2/15/07, Keith Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I built a new computer: Core 2 Duo 32-bit Debian etch with numpy > > > > 1.0.2.dev3546. The repeatability test still fails. In order to make my > > > > calculations repeatable I'll have to remove ATLAS. That really slows > > > > things down. > > > > > > Hey, I have no problem with atlas-base and atlas-sse! On my old debian > > > box all versions of atlas fail the repeatability test. > > > > You mean on the Core 2 Dua 32-bit only atlas-sse2 causes troubles ? > > How does the speed compare atlas-sse2 vs. atlas-see (ignoring the > > repeatablity problem)? > > Yes. On my old computer (P4) all three (atlas-base, -sse, -sse2) cause > problems. On my new computer only sse2 causes a problem. > > I only want to know about the speed difference (sse, sse2) if the > difference is small.
I was just wondering what generally the speed improvement from sse to sse2 is ? Any tentative number would be fine... -S. _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
