Hi James On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 08:29:50PM -0400, James Turner wrote: > > It looks like the last output value is produced by reflecting the > > input and then interpolating, but presumably then the first value > > should be 3.9, for consistency, not 3.1? Does that make sense? > > Aargh. I think I see what's happening now. The input is supposed to > be interpolated and then reflected like this: > > [4 3 2 1] -> [3.1 3.1 2.1 1.1 1.1] > > The problem is that there is still one value too many being > "interpolated" here before the reflection takes place. Do the > sections beginning at lines 168 & 178 need changing in a similar way > to their counterparts at lines 129 & 139? I started looking into > this, but I don't understand the code well enough to be sure I'm > making the right changes...
Thanks for spotting that. When I fix those lines, I see: [[ 3.9000001 3.0999999 2.0999999 1.10000002 1.89999998 2.9000001 ] [ 3.9000001 3.0999999 2.0999999 1.10000002 1.89999998 2.9000001 ]] I'll submit to SVN later today. Note that I also enabled 'mirror' mode, which works almost the same way as reflect: Reflect: 1 2 3 4 -> 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 Mirror: 1 2 3 4 -> 1 2 3 4 3 2 1 Cheers Stéfan _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion