2007/12/10, Alexander Michael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Dec 10, 2007 6:48 AM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Several people reported problems with numpy 1.0.4 (See #627 and > > #628, but also other problems mentionned on the ML, which I cannot > > find). They were all solved, as far as I know, by a binary I produced > > (simply using mingw + netlib BLAS/LAPACK, no ATLAS). Maybe it would be > > good to use those instead ? (I can recompile them if there is a special > > thing to do to build them) > > Do I understand correctly that you are suggesting removing ATLAS from > the Windows distribution? Wouldn't this make numpy very slow? I know > on RHEL5 I see a very large improvement between the basic BLAS/LAPACK > and ATLAS. Perhaps we should make an alternative Windows binary > available without ATLAS just for those having problems with ATLAS?
That's why David proposed the netlib version of BLAS/LAPACK and not the default implementation in numpy. I would agree with David ;) Matthieu -- French PhD student Website : http://matthieu-brucher.developpez.com/ Blogs : http://matt.eifelle.com and http://blog.developpez.com/?blog=92 LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
