Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Lou Pecora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> --- Matthieu Brucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> >> > It was added as a compile-time #define on the SVN >> > some days ago ;) >> > >> > Matthieu >> >> Thanks, Matthieu, that's a good step. But when the >> SVD function throws an exception is it clear that the >> user can redefine niter and recompile? Otherwise, the >> fix remains well hidden. Most user will be left >> puzzled. I think a comment in the raise statement >> would be good. Just point to the solution or where >> the user could find it. >> > > That's a valid concern. We could maybe pass down the iteration limit > as a keyword? > This won't work without significant re-design. This limit is in the low-level code which is an f2c'd version of some BLAS which is NumPy's default SVD implementation if it can't find a vendor BLAS.
-Travis O. _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
