Bill Baxter wrote: > I'm afraid I'm not much help answering your questions. But one thing > I've wondered about f2py is if it could be generalized into an f2*** > tool. How intertwined is the analysis of the fortran with the > synthesis of the python? There are lots of languages that could > benefit from a fortran wrapper generator tool.
This is a very good question. In fact, the g3 f2py contains a full parser of Fortran 77/../2003 codes that is independent of how the parsed tree will be used. It could be used as a starting point to many tools like Fortran to C/C++ converters, as well as generating wrappers for other scripting languages. So, I think this is something worth of keeping in mind indeed when developing g3 f2py. Although, I would need more support to take this task of generalizing f2py to f2**. Regards, Pearu _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion