On 16/04/2008, Alan Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems lots of complexity for a payoff I do not see. > My proposal is simpler and stays closer to ndarray behavior.
I showed you exactly where your proposal breaks down -- numerous times: x[0] is no longer the same as x[0,:] > But having a matrix be a container of such "RowVectors" is > better than the current behavior. I do not see that it > gets in the way of anything desirable, as long as the > array attribute of your "vectors" will return a 1d array. Did you try the patch? Do you think that a (column) vector should convert to a 1d array? Stéfan _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion