2008/4/25 Alan G Isaac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I must have misunderstood: > I thought the agreement was to > provisionally return a 1d array for x[0], > while we hashed through the other proposals.
The agreement was: a) That x[0][0] should be equal to x[0,0] and b) That x[0,:] should be equal to x[0] (as for ndarrays) This breaks as little functionality as possible, at the cost of one (instead of two) API changes. We should now discuss the proposals on the table, choose a good one, and implement all the API changes necessary for 1.2 or 2. It's a pity we have to change the API again, but the current situation is not tenable. Cheers Stéfan _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
