On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Gael Varoquaux < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:03:58PM +0200, Anne Archibald wrote: > > I am puzzled by this. What is the rationale for x[i,:] not being a 1-d > > object? > > It breaks A*B[i, :] where A and B are matrices. Shouldn't that be B[i,:] * A? Or am I just confused? In any event this wouldn't be a problem under row/column scheme or any of the other results that end up tagging the results with some metainformation. B[i] would be tagged as a row vector somehow and __mul__ would "do the right thing" even though it was 1D. -- . __ . |-\ . . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
