On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Keith Goodman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Stuart Brorson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> In [66]: numpy.sign(numpy.nan) >>> Out[66]: 0.0 >>> >>> IMO, the output should be NaN, not zero. >> >> You're probably right. I would like to see what other systems do >> before changing it, though. > > octave:1> sign(nan) > ans = NaN
Works for me. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
