It looks like there is significant interest in using "np" instead of "numpy" in the examples (i.e. we expect the user to do "import numpy as np" before trying code snippets).
Would anybody who objects to using "np" raise it now, so that we can bury this issue? Regards Stéfan 2008/5/22 Rob Hetland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On May 22, 2008, at 11:37 AM, Pauli Virtanen wrote: > >> Or should we "assume from numpy import *" or "import numpy as np"? I > > > Although a good case could probably be made for all three (*, np, > numpy), I think that if "import numpy as np" is to be put forward as > the standard coding style, the examples should use this as well. > > -Rob > > ---- > Rob Hetland, Associate Professor > Dept. of Oceanography, Texas A&M University > http://pong.tamu.edu/~rob > phone: 979-458-0096, fax: 979-845-6331 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Numpy-discussion@scipy.org > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
