Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > 2008/6/24 Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> It should be fairly easy to execute the example code, just to make >> sure it runs. We can always work out a scheme to test its validity >> later.
Hi, > Mike Hansen just explained to me that the Sage doctest system sets the > random seed before executing each test. If we address > > a) Random variables we have some small extensions to the doctesting framework that allow us to mark doctests as "#random" so that the result it not checked. Carl Witty wrote some code that makes the random number generator in a lot of the Sage components behave consistently on all supported platforms. > b) Plotting representations and > c) Endianness Yeah, the Sage test suite seems to catch at least one of those in every release cycle. Another thing we just implemented is a "jar of pickles" that lets us verify that there is no cross platform issues (32 vs. 64 bits and big vs. little endian) as well as no problems with loading pickles from previous releases. > we're probably halfway there. > > Regards > Stéfan Cheers, Michael > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Numpy-discussion@scipy.org > http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion