On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 14:14, Alan McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> If the >>> auto-ignore capability is still needed after that, I'll work on it. >> >> It seems to me that the ellipsis mechanism just allows the output to >> differ. However, matplotlib would still be required because plt.plot() >> would still be executed. matplotlib should not be a requirement for >> running the tests. > > Oops, I misunderstood, then: I thought the intent was to execute the > statement but not compare the output (because they returned objects > that had their address in the repr). > > I didn't look before to see how many times this feature would be > needed (yeah, should have done that before complaining about using > #doctest: +SKIP), but now that I look, I only see one batch of plt. > commands, in numpy.lib.function_base.bartlett. In view of that, does > it make more sense to use the SKIP directive for the ten plt. lines in > that one example?
Can it work on an entire section? If not, can we do something that works on a whole section? Everything after "Plot the window and its frequency response:" is not required for testing. -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
