2008/7/23 Fernando Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm just reposting here to see if anyone with a stake in f2py has an > opinion/advice on the points below. F2py feels very much in > autopilot/drifting into the icebergs mode right now. Is that correct > assessment? > > If there's any guidance on where to go, I can at least file tickets on > these points, but I don't want to create unnecessary tickets on trac > if others feel the current situation is satisfactory and it's just me > who is confused.
As far as I understand, Pearu is busy developing g3 of f2py. Does that mean that f2py in NumPy is effectively unmaintained? I hope not. I agree (with your previous e-mail) that it would be good to have some documentation, so if you could give me some pointers on *what* to document (I haven't used f2py much), then I'll try my best to get around to it. Cheers Stéfan _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
