On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Andrew Dalke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm. And it looks like testing/nosetester.py (which implements the > 'test' function above) is meant to make it easier to run nose, except > my feeling is the extra level of wrapping makes things more > complicated. The nosetest command-line appears to be more flexible, > with support for, for examples, dropping into the debugger on errors, > and reseting the coverage test files.
You can actually pass those sorts of options to nose through the extra_argv parameter in test(). That might be a little cumbersome, but (as far as I know) it's something I'm going to do so infrequently it's not a big deal. _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
