Stéfan van der Walt wrote: > 2008/8/11 Robert Cimrman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> Note also that the order of outputs has changed (previously unique1d() >>>> returned (i, b) for return_index=True). >>> Does this not constitute an API change? >> It does. Are there many users of unique1d( a, return_index=True ) out there? >> >> The new way is consistent with matlab, and IMHO more logical - the >> additional return values are appended to the returned tuple rather than >> prepended. It was my mistake to introduce the previous order (do not >> recall the motivation anymore :]). > > The new way is definitely more consistent -- I think one could almost > call its current behaviour a bug. Unless there are objections, let's > follow the standard route: put a deprecation warning in place for one > release and remove it in the next.
Yeah, that's why I think not many people used the extra return anyway. I will do as you say unless somebody steps in. r. _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
