Hi Stefan, yes, indeed, that's what I thought. This result is odd. Has correlate been changed since version 1.0.4, or should I submit this as a bug?
Best regards, Hanno Stéfan van der Walt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > ------=_Part_25307_10322093.1219268954678 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Disposition: inline > > 2008/8/20 Hanno Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > In [29]: x =3D array([0.,0.,1, 0, 0]) > > In [35]: y1 =3D array([1,0,0,0,0]) > > > > In [36]: correlate(x,y1,mode=3D'full') > > Out[36]: array([ 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 1., 0., 0.]) > > That doesn't look right. Under r5661: > > In [60]: np.convolve([0, 0, 1, 0, 0], [1, 0, 0, 0, 0], mode=3D'f') > Out[60]: array([0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]) > > Regards > St=E9fan > > ------=_Part_25307_10322093.1219268954678 > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Disposition: inline > > <div dir=3D"ltr">2008/8/20 Hanno Klemm <<a href=3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > z.ch">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</a>>:<br>> In [29]: x =3D array([0.,0.,1, 0,= > 0])<br>> In [35]: y1 =3D array([1,0,0,0,0])<br>><br>> In [36]: co= > rrelate(x,y1,mode=3D'full')<br> > > Out[36]: array([ 0., 0., 0., 0., 0., 0.,= > 1., 0., 0.])<br><br>That doesn't look right. U= > nder r5661:<br><br>In [60]: np.convolve([0, 0, 1, 0, 0], [1, 0, 0, 0, 0], m= > ode=3D'f')<br>Out[60]: array([0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0])<br> > <br>Regards<br>St=E9fan<br><br></div> > > ------=_Part_25307_10322093.1219268954678-- > -- Hanno Klemm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion