2008/9/15 Gael Varoquaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I agree. But that means that we can only include it in 1.3 (which is >> currently being developed on trunk, IIRC?). > > I'd prefer not seeing any non-backwards-compatible API change before 2.0. > I think we would be breaking the contract that we have with our users, > that are going to see some code that worked suddenly break.
We could always return lists *only* for mixed type ogrids. While that preserves backwards compatibility, it is really ugly :/ I understand all the arguments involved, but I see much pain and suffering (Yoda be my witness) in cementing ourselves to an immature Python-level API. Cheers Stéfan _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
