On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Charles R Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> Hi All, > > I've been cleaning up the ufunc loops and the sign function currently > doesn't have a defined behavior for nans. This makes the results depend on > the order/type of comparisons in the code, which looks fragile to me. So > what should it return? I vote for nan but am open for suggestions. > And while we're at it, lets decide how to treat max/min when nans are involved. Or should we just say the behavior is undefined. Chuck
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
