On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:41 AM, David Cournapeau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Charles R Harris > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Which is rather clever. I think binary_cast will require some pointer > abuse. > > Yep (the funny thing is that the bit twiddling will likely end up more > readable than this C++ stuff) > The zip file has the bit twiddling, which is worth looking at if only for the note on the PPC extended precision. Motorola seems to be a problem but I don't think we support any of the 66xx series. Chuck
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
