On Oct 22, 2008, at 5:15 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > > I would add another position (my own) to the "Arguments neutral > towards or against the PEP": > > * I really only care about having just *one* extra operator, one that > I can (ab)use for matrix multiplication. It's the only operation that > is common enough and with one obvious implementation (I'm looking at > you, Matlab's "\") to warrant it, IMO. Doubling the number of > operators and special methods is not a price that I'm willing to pay > to get it, though. > Note that although some of the proposals allow for a doubling of the number of possible operators, numpy doesn't have to use them all and thus doesn't need to double the number of special methods. I'd agree that only a few are really necessary (to matrix multiply I'd add the logical operators as well).
Perry _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
