On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 4:54 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > one small typo: in the "Why just go one step?" section, you have the phrase: > > "and it is thus wortwhile solving the general problem" > > wortwhile should be worthwhile. >
Thanks, fixed. > I've posted a message about this to sage-devel, as they are likely > interested in this topic as well. Thanks. I did mention it a while ago on the sage lists, and asked them at scipy'08. William said he wasn't terribly interested one way or another. It's worth keeping in mind that Sage already preparses the user input and has thus effectively the freedom to define its own syntax. But others may have different opinions from William on this, and I'll be glad to include any further input from the Sage team. Regards, f _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
