On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 3:02 PM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: > Sat, 20 Dec 2008 20:15:43 +0900, David Cournapeau wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote: >>> Just to make it clear -- I think the docs should not be generated in >>> the tarball -- only the sources should be there. >> >> I agree this makes more sense for you, as a packager, but I am not sure >> it makes much sense to put the doc sources in the tarball for users >> (Building numpy should only require python + a C compiler; building the >> doc is more difficult -you need at least sphinx and all its >> dependencies). >> >> For audiolab, I put the generated doc, thinking if people want to mess >> with the doc, they are knowledgeable enough to deal with svn - but I did >> not think about the packagers :) I am not sure what's the best solution: >> maybe put both in the (released) source tarball ? > > I'd say that we put the source for the documentation to the documentation > tarball, and distribute the built HTML+whatever documentation in a > separate package.
Why not to just include the *sources* together with numpy, and possibly include html+whatever in a separate documentation package? That way everybody is happy. Ondrej _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion