Pierre GM wrote: > On Jan 4, 2009, at 4:47 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 15:44, Pierre GM <pgmdevl...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> If we used np.asanyarray instead, subclasses are recognized properly, >>> the mask is recognized by argsort and the result correct. >>> Is there a reason why we use np.asarray instead of np.asanyarray ? >> Probably not. > > So there wouldn't be any objections to make the switch ? We can wait a > couple of days if anybody has a pb with that...
There are probably other functions in arraysetops that could be fixed easily to work with masked arrays, feel free to do it if you like. I have never worked with the masked arrays, so the np.asarray problem had not come to my mind. Also, if you change np.asarray to np.asanyarray, add a corresponding test emplying the masked arrays to test_arraysetops.py, please. cheers & thanks, r. _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
