Scott Sinclair <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2009/2/4 David Cournapeau <[email protected]>: >> On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Pierre GM <[email protected]> wrote: >>> All, >>> When can we expect numpy 1.3 to be released ? >> >> I think official 2.6 support (with binaries for the platforms where we >> support binaries), x64 support and everything which has been done >> already would be enough to make a release.
I'd like to see a self-consistent and reasonably recent numpy/scipy make the Ubuntu 9.04 FeatureFreeze deadline of 19 February. Is this possible? One of the reasons we had discussed doing more frequent releases was to get consistent and recent packages in the mainstream Linuxes, and Ubuntu is very popular in our community. >There are a bunch of documentation patches that should to be reviewed >and applied to SVN before the release (especially those marked 'Needs >review' or better). >http://docs.scipy.org/numpy/patch/ At this point, we're focussing on getting semi-decent drafts of as many docstrings as possible rather than on polishing the ones we have as drafts, on the basis of "something is always better than nothing as long as it's not wrong". So, please don't hold up a release for review, just get as many drafts in as possible. Also, it has become clear that we need separate technical and writing reviews, as a number of pages marked as "reviewed" are deficient in one or the other area, probably the one that wasn't the strength of the reviewer. That entails discussion and revamping of the site, which can happen once we have a larger percentage of the docstrings in draft form. (Any discussion on the merits of this should take place on scipy-dev, which is the home of doc discussions.) --jh-- _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list [email protected] http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
