Thanks for the input, guys. I'll be looking into the scikits.timeseries package before submitting an application.
>was it the intent that these new data types should be implemented at the >C/cython level? That's fine with me. I've got plenty of experience in C++, and I've delved into my fair share of C (just for the record). I'm planning on writing up a proposal, so if anyone has further input, I would really appreciate it. 2009/3/25 Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com>: > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Pierre GM <pgmdevl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Ciao Marty, >> Great idea indeed ! However, I'd really like to have an easy way to >> plug the suggested dtype w/ the existing Date class from the >> scikits.timeseries package (Date is implemented in C, you can find the >> sources through the link on http://pytseries.sourceforge.net). I agree >> that this particular aspect is not a priority, but it'd be nice to >> keep it in a corner of the mind. >> In any case, keep me in the loop. >> Cheers, >> P. > > Just for clarification, was it the intent that these new data types should > be implemented at the C/cython level? If so, the project probably requires a > knowlege of C and some help digging through the lower levels of numpy. > > <snip> > > Chuck > > > > _______________________________________________ > Numpy-discussion mailing list > Numpy-discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion