On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Andrew Straw <straw...@astraw.com> wrote: > Matthieu Brucher wrote: >>> One thing about git-svn is that this is not really needed if you just >>> use git and I installed git from source on many linuxes and clusters >>> and it just works, as it is just pure C. I usually just use git-svn on >>> my laptop/workstation, where I install the Debian/Ubuntu packages, and >>> I create the git repository, upload to github.com or somewhere else >>> and just work with the git repository. >>> >>> But I agree that if it installs git-svn and it doesn't just work, it's >>> a big problem. >> >> I was inquiring the use of git with the use of one of our internal svn >> repositories, just to have a feeling about it :( > > My opinion is that attempting to use git-svn to get a feeling of git is > not a good idea. There's too much slowness of svn involved, too much > pain of trying to learn git while also trying to learn git-svn (which > itself has corner cases and such that pure git doesn't) and there's no > bidirectional 1:1 mapping between branches (that I've found), > eliminating a huge part of the joy of git -- cheap branches. > > Better to start developing on a pure git project to get a feel. You > can't go wrong with sympy, for example. :)
Oh, definitely. :) Here is a list of easy to fix issues: http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/list?q=label:EasyToFix if you want to learn it on some easy, but real world example. :) Ondrej _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion