On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 19:03, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Robert Kern <robert.k...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 16:27, Charles R Harris > >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > Hi Pauli, > >> > > >> > I'm going to move the docstrings from mtrand.pyx to add_newdocs.py. > Will > >> > this require any fixes to the doc editor so that the docs don't get > >> > readded > >> > to mtrand? > >> > >> IIRC, David has told me that recent Cythons will do the right thing > >> with the docstrings. It would be easier simply to build mtrand.c with > >> Cython instead of Pyrex. It would be cleaner to keep the docstrings > >> attached to the source. > > > > Are Cython and Pyrex still close enough to be interchangeable? > > David and others have built it so before. > > > I also like > > the idea of having all the docs in add_newdocs so that no one has to go > > looking for them. I would even prefer having the python function docs > there > > ;) > > Ugh. I really, really don't. > OK, I just ran mtrand through cython-0.9.8.1.1, which is probably horribly outdated, and it does break up the strings. So that is a possibility. Anyone else want to express a preference as to where the docs should go? Chuck
_______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
