On 12-May-09, at 3:55 PM, Ryan May wrote: > > It's going to be faster to do it without the transpose. Besides, > for numpy, > that imshow becomes: > > imshow(b[0]) > > Which, IMHO, looks better than Matlab.
You're right, that is better, odd how I never thought of doing it like that. I've been stuck in my Matlab-esque world with dstack() as my default mental model of how images/matrices ought to be stacked. Am I right in thinking that b[0] is stored in a big contiguous block of memory, thus making the read marginally faster than slicing on the third? David _______________________________________________ Numpy-discussion mailing list Numpy-discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
